Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, having a global score of 87.1 against 74.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better display than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a lot lower number of pixels in each inch of display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much longer battery lifetime than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.