Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2018-04-20 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play is a bit better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, getting a overall score of 76.3 against 74.2. The Nokia 8 Sirocco features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The Moto Z3 Play features a bigger storage for games and applications than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 8 Sirocco features a little faster processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has more RAM.
The Moto Z3 Play takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco. Both of them have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size sensor, the same resolution back camera and a same size diafragm aperture. Nokia 8 Sirocco has just a little bit longer battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.