Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Neo is slightly better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, having a 77.7 score against 74.2. The OPPO Find X2 Neo is a noticeably heavier cellphone than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, but they are equally thin. OPPO Find X2 Neo features just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots much better pictures and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with longer battery lifetime than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.