Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, getting a score of 79.9 against 74.2. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little more vivid display than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display.
Nokia 8 Sirocco has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.