Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, getting a 90.8 score against 74.2. The Nokia 8 Sirocco features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy A51 5G features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Nokia 8 Sirocco features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes much better videos and photos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a much larger camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a really longer battery life than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.