Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2018-04-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is way better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco's score of 74.2. The Nokia 8 Sirocco features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Nokia 8 Sirocco features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures way better photographs and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
The Galaxy A52 counts with more storage for apps and games than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 38% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.