Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | -- |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, having an 82.6 score against 74.2. Nokia 8 Sirocco has a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 has a brighter display than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco features a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 MP resolution.
Galaxy S25 has improved battery duration than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 23 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.