Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2018-04-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a global score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco's general score of 74.2. Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a bit more vivid display than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S7 Active features improved battery duration than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active shoots much better videos and photos than Nokia 8 Sirocco. Both have a same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.