Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco's overall score of 74.2. The Nokia 8 Sirocco has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Nokia 8 Sirocco has more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Nokia 8 Sirocco has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has more RAM.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with superior battery life than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor taking way worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much better 25 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.