Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, with an 88.5 score against 74.2. Nokia 8 Sirocco features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior processor than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3260mAh. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a greater camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, they both have the same back camera sensor size, a same resolution camera in the back, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.