Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, with a overall score of 92.3 against 74.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same sensor size, a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the same video quality and the same video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.