Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than Nokia 8 Sirocco's general score of 74.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better processing power than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Nokia 8 Sirocco has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes greater photographs and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, a 12 MP resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.