Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| -- | 9.56 ounces |
| Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, getting a 90.6 score against 74.2. The Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has a lot bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior battery life than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.