Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is slightly better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, having a global score of 78.1 against 74.2. Nokia 8 Sirocco has a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco has a superior memory for applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a much higher video quality, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light environments. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.