Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's general score of 80.3. Google Nexus 6's body is somewhat lighter than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it's thicker and was released 6 years before. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10.
The Google Nexus 6 has a sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels number per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Google Nexus 6 features a little better performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a lot better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in low light situations, a lot more MP back facing camera and better video frame rate. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Nexus 6, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.