Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Google Pixel's 80.2 score. Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a a lot newer phone than Google Pixel, but it's a bit thicker and notably heavier. Google Pixel has a little bit better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen density.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a greater camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and better 60 fps video frame rates.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 62 percent greater battery size.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Pixel, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.