Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, with an 82.5 score against 80.3. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is noticeably lighter and thinner than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 XL's processor is very similar to Nokia 8 V 5G UW's processor, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a slightly better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixels amount per inch in the display. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has higher video frame rates, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.