Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 overall score. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is older than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, it's design is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little faster CPU than Nokia 8 V 5G UW. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better looking display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count per inch in the screen. Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a camera with way more MP, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.