Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Meteor grey | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 77. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a way newer cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but it is extremely heavier and thicker. HTC U Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen pixel density.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.