Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is just a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, getting an 85.4 score against 80.3. LG K92's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though both of them were released only 0 months apart. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit superior processing unit than LG K92. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
LG K92 and Nokia 8 V 5G UW have similar screens, because although the LG K92 has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels number in each display inch. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots clearer photos and videos than LG K92, and although they both have a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures.
The LG K92 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a little bit longer battery life than LG K92, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG K92 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.