Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's score of 80.3. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than Nokia 8 V 5G UW.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a sharper display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count per screen inch.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low light situations and a tinier sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro and Nokia 8 V 5G UW both have quite similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.