Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-12 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is notably newer, but thicker and much heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has faster video frame rates and a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Force, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.