Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Meteor grey | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a score of 80.3 against 77.4. Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is incredibly heavier and thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a little better performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a much more megapixels camera in the back and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.