Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Play, getting an 80.3 score against 77.4. Even though the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is notably newer than Moto Z2 Play, it is thicker and notably heavier. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a display that's very similar to the Nokia 8 V 5G UW one, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density. The Moto Z2 Play features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.