Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Meteor grey | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is way newer than the Moto Z3 Play, it's notably heavier and much thicker. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM.
Moto Z3 Play has a display that's just as good as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW one, because although the Moto Z3 Play has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Moto Z3 Play counts with a better storage for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs more money than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.