Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is slightly better than Motorola One Action, getting a score of 80.3 against 78.5. Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is notably heavier than Motorola One Action, it's just a little thinner and newer. The Motorola One Action has a little bit better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a bit better pixel count in each display inch.
The Motorola One Action features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Motorola One Action also has more internal storage. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has better video frame rates and a much higher resolution camera in the back. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features improved battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Action, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.