Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 score. The Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but Samsung was able to build it extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Galaxy A50 both feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A50 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A50 has a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution, a lot better (4K) video definition and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.