Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 general score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version. Galaxy A51's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though it was released around 11 months before.
The Galaxy A51 and Nokia 8 V 5G UW both feature quite similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A51 has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A51 features a bit sharper display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a bigger sensor.
Galaxy A51 features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.