Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Meteor grey | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, getting a general score of 91.3 against 80.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though they were released only a couple of months apart. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little sharper display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little better quantity of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's processing unit is just as good as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW one, both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy A52 5G and Nokia 8 V 5G UW count with very similar batteries duration. Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality, a 64 MP back-facing camera and a same size aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.