Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-12 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Even though the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is extremely newer than the Galaxy A6, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a bigger display and a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a very superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a way better resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A6, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.