Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy F62 and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy F62 body is a bit lighter but just a little thicker. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10.
Galaxy F62's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although the Galaxy F62 has 4 lesser processing cores , they both have a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a quite better count of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same resolution back facing camera, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.