Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is slightly better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's overall score of 80.3. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features and increased performance. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is extremely lighter and thinner than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, despite of the fact that it was released just a little more than a year before.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit more powerful processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a better pixel count per inch in the display.
Galaxy S10 has a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has better battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S10 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.