Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | -- |
| 387 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a score of 80.3 against 80.1. Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a incredibly thinner and lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better processing power than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Nokia 8 V 5G UW.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.