Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's overall score of 80.3. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a just a bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better storage to install applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit faster processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a much bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia 8 V 5G UW. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.