Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than Nokia 8, getting an 82.9 score against 73.8. Google Pixel 4a is a notably newer and lighter device than Nokia 8, but it's also a little bit thicker. Nokia 8 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Nokia 8 features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a just a little higher pixel density. The Google Pixel 4a takes clearer photos and videos than Nokia 8, because although it has a camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Nokia 8 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little better battery duration than Nokia 8, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.