Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Nokia 8, getting a score of 87.6 against 73.8. The LG V60 ThinQ body is way newer than the Nokia 8's, although it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia 8 features a more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher screen pixel density. LG V60 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Nokia 8, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a lot better video definition.
The LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory for games and applications than Nokia 8, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery life than Nokia 8, because it has a 62% greater battery size.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.