Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the Nokia 8, with a score of 86.3 against 73.8. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is much newer than Nokia 8's, although it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Nokia 8 features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Nokia 8 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and much lower brightness, it also counts with a better pixels number in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Nokia 8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way better camera than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a camera with a way better resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a way bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia 8, because it has a 46 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.