Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the Nokia 8's general score of 73.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is a lot newer than Nokia 8's, but it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Nokia 8, because although it has a lot lower pixel number per display inch and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with much more brightness and a larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia 8 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than Nokia 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3090mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way better resolution back camera and a larger aperture for better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.