Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-08-28 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a little bit better than Nokia 8, having a 75.8 score against 73.8. Moto Z Force's body is a little thinner than the Nokia 8, but it's just a bit heavier and was released a little bit further than a year before. Nokia 8 features just a bit better display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560px resolution, the Nokia 8 also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
The Nokia 8 has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Nokia 8 also has a greater number of cores. The Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z Force also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Moto Z Force counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Nokia 8, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force has just a little better battery life than Nokia 8, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3090mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Moto Z Force is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.