Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 554 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the Nokia 8's 73.8 global score. Motorola One Hyper's body is notably newer, but much heavier and thicker than Nokia 8. The Nokia 8 has a sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 8, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Nokia 8 has a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. They have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Motorola One Hyper features improved battery lifetime than Nokia 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3090mAh. Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola One Hyper not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.