Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Nokia 8, having an 87 score against 73.8. The Motorola razr (2020) is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Nokia 8, but both of them have the same thickness. Nokia 8 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster CPU than Nokia 8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) features a way better camera than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Nokia 8 has a little better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3090mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Nokia 8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia 8. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some dollars and get the Nokia 8, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.