Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 554 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than Nokia 8's overall score of 73.8. Samsung Galaxy F62's design is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Nokia 8. The Nokia 8 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Nokia 8 has a better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each screen inch, a way brighter screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Nokia 8, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes a lot better videos and photos than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a lot better resolution camera in the back, a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery life than Nokia 8, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.