Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Nokia 8, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 73.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat heavier than Nokia 8, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processor than Nokia 8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 8 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better battery duration than Nokia 8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3090mAh. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better camera than Nokia 8, because although it has a worse video resolution and a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Nokia 8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 8. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Nokia 8, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.