Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is much better than Nokia 8's 73.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Nokia 8, but it's somewhat heavier. The Nokia 8 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Nokia 8 counts with a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little better performance than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nokia 8 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in low light environments, it also counts with a more megapixels camera in the back. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit superior battery life than Nokia 8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more money than Nokia 8, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.