Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Nokia 8, with a 94.6 score against 73.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is way newer and thinner than the Nokia 8's, although it is also incredibly heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better hardware performance than Nokia 8, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Nokia 8 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery performance than Nokia 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better camera than Nokia 8, because although it has a camera with less MP resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way more expensive than the Nokia 8, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.