Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is much better than Nokia 8's score of 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is noticeably newer and thinner than the Nokia 8's, but it is also noticeably heavier. The Nokia 8 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, it also counts with more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better processing power than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 8, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Nokia 8, because it has a 42 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia 8 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture for better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.