Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.8 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.10 x 1.80 x 0.80 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.40 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 75.00 |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 192 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
Motorola W315 has a general score of 24.7, which is a bit better than Nokia 8260's global score of 22.8. Motorola W315's design is just a little thicker but somewhat lighter than Nokia 8260. Motorola W315 and Nokia 8260 have incredibly similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores.
The Motorola W315 features a much better looking screen than Nokia 8260. The Motorola W315's camera is just as good as the Nokia 8260 one. The Motorola W315 has as much memory capacity for apps and games as the Nokia 8260 one. Nokia 8260 features just a bit better battery life than Motorola W315, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola W315 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.