Search


Compare phones

Global Score
22.864.8
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
--Android 9.0 Pie
--2019-06-10
4.10 x 1.80 x 0.80 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
3.40 ounces5.50 ounces
--Black
--Metal and Plastic
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--5.5 inches
--1440 x 720 pixels
--IPS LCD
--293 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.77.3
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
--2 GB RAM
GPUAdreno 504 GPU
5.768.73
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
08.12
Camera
--8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
08.47
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
--LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
--Nano SIM
06.1
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
192 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
--
2.484.96
Other Features
--Bluetooth 5.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 3.1 A has a global score of 64.8, which is way better than Nokia 8260's 22.8 score. Nokia 3.1 A's body is notably thinner but notably heavier than Nokia 8260. The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a lot better looking screen than Nokia 8260. The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Nokia 8260, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 128 GB.

Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much faster processing unit than Nokia 8260, because it has 4 more processing cores. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a greater camera than Nokia 8260. The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a really longer battery duration than Nokia 8260, because it has a 2990mAh battery size instead of 920mAh.

The Nokia 3.1 A costs the same than Nokia 8260, which makes it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.