Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 22.9 | 29.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Panasonic |
| -- | 2005-02-14 |
| 4.00 x 1.80 x 0.90 inches | 3.78 x 1.81 x 0.98 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 4.48 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| -- | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1660mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 96 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | 740 hours standby time 12 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 3.52 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Panasonic SA6 is way better than the Nokia 8270, getting a score of 29.3 against 22.9. The Panasonic SA6 construction is way heavier and a little bit thicker than Nokia 8270. The Panasonic SA6 counts with a lot better looking screen than Nokia 8270. Panasonic SA6 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8270.
The Nokia 8270 and the Panasonic SA6 both feature really similar processing units, both have the same number of cores. The Panasonic SA6 features a greater camera than Nokia 8270. The Panasonic SA6 has a superior battery life than Nokia 8270, because it has 1660mAh of battery capacity.
The Panasonic SA6 costs the same than the Nokia 8270, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.