Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.8 | 29.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Panasonic |
| -- | 2005-02-14 |
| 4.00 x 1.75 x 0.68 inches | 3.78 x 1.81 x 0.98 inches |
| 2.80 ounces | 4.48 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| -- | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1660mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 96 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | 740 hours standby time 12 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 3.52 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Panasonic SA6 is much better than Nokia 8290, with a global score of 29.3 against 23.8. Panasonic SA6 is a thicker and heavier cellphone than the Nokia 8290. Panasonic SA6 features a way better looking display than Nokia 8290. The Panasonic SA6 and Nokia 8290 count with similar processing units, both have 0 cores.
The Panasonic SA6 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8290. The Panasonic SA6 counts with a way better battery life than Nokia 8290, because it has a 121% more battery capacity. Panasonic SA6 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia 8290.
Panasonic SA6 and the Nokia 8290 cost exactly the same, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.